Keywords
birth
labor (childbirth)
humanization assistance
How to Cite
Abstract
Introduction: professionals in the obstetric field play an important role in meeting women's expectations, which influences their satisfaction with childbirth. Aim: To assess the perception of obstetric team professionals on women's expectations regarding labor and birth and their influence on the labor process. Methods: Qualitative study whose data were obtained using the focus group technique and interpreted through content analysis proposed by Bardin. A non-random convenience sample was recruited. Participants were professionals working in obstetrics (doctors and obstetric nurses, doula), who were asked to consider aspects of their experience and professional experience concerning labor and birth. Result: Eight specialists participated in the meeting, including doctors, obstetric nurses and doulas. The analysis of the discussion generated in the group resulted in five distinct themes: influences in the choice of childbirth; choosing a cesarean; the fear of giving birth; childbirth today; the professional’s role. Conclusion: Even among professionals, the discussion about expectations is focused on women's choices regarding the type of birth and its intervening factors. Health professionals have an important role in addressing these feelings from the prenatal stage onwards, demystifying preconceptions, and providing appropriate guidance to women.
References
Arrebola, N. R., Mahía, P. L., López, S. B., Castiñeira, N. L., Pillado, T. S., & Díaz, S. P. (2021). Women’s satisfaction with childbirth and postpartum care and associated variables. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 55, e03720. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1980-220x2020006603720
Baldisserotto, M. L., Theme Filha, M. M., & da Gama, S. G. N. (2016). Good practices according to WHO’s recommendation for normal labor and birth and women’s assessment of the care received: The “birth in Brazil” national research study, 2011/2012. Reproductive Health, 13(3), 200–265. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-016-0233-x
Barros, T. U., Frigo, L. F., & Stoelben, K. J. V. (2022). O impacto do pré-natal na satisfação com o parto. Research, Society and Development, 11(5), e39711528434. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i5.28434
Benute, G. R. G., Nomura, R. Y., Santos, A. M. D., Zarvos, M. A., Lucia, M. C. S. D., & Francisco, R. P. V. (2013). Preferência pela via de parto: Uma comparação entre gestantes nulíparas e primíparas. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, 35(6), 281–285. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-72032013000600008
Bohren, M. A., Hofmeyr, G. J., Sakala, C., Fukuzawa, R. K., & Cuthbert, A. (2017). Continuous support for women during childbirth. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 7(7), CD003766. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub6
Costa, D. D. O., Ribeiro, V. S., Ribeiro, M. R. C., Esteves-Pereira, A. P., Leal, M. C., & Silva, A. A. M. (2023). Influence of mode of delivery on satisfaction with hospitalization for childbirth in the study Birth in Brazil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 39, e00138922. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311XEN138922
Costa, D. D. O., Ribeiro, V. S., Ribeiro, M. R. C., Esteves-Pereira, A. P., Sá, L. G. C., Cruz, J. A. S., Leal, M. C., & Silva, A. A. M. (2019). Psychometric properties of the hospital birth satisfaction scale: Birth in Brazil survey. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 35(8), e00154918. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00154918
Marin, D. F. A., Wernke, A. R., Dannehl, D., Araujo, D., Koch, G. F., Zanoni, K. M., Coral, K. B. D., Guimarães, N. V. Feuerschuette, O. & Iser, B. P. M. (2021). The Project Appropriate Birth and a reduction in caesarean section rates: an analysis using the Robson classification system. BJOG – An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 129(1), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16919
Domingues, R. M. S. M., Dias, M. A. B., Nakamura-Pereira, M., Torres, J. A., d’Orsi, E., Pereira, A. P. E., Schilithz, A. O. C., & Leal, M. do C. (2014). Processo de decisão pelo tipo de parto no Brasil: Da preferência inicial das mulheres à via de parto final. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 30, S101–S116. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00105113
Ferrari, A. P., Almeida, M. A. M., Carvalhaes, M. A. B. L., & Parada, C. M. G. L. (2020). Effects of elective cesarean sections on perinatal outcomes and care practices. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Materno Infantil, 20, 879–888. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-93042020000300012
Gama, A. S., Giffin, K. M., Angulo-Tuesta, A., Barbosa, G. P., & d’Orsi, E. (2009). Representações e experiências das mulheres sobre a assistência ao parto vaginal e cesárea em maternidades pública e privada. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 25, 2480–2488. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2009001100017
Gregory, K. D., Korst, L. M., Saeb, S., McCulloch, J., Greene, N., Fink, A., & Fridman, M. (2019). Childbirth-specific patient-reported outcomes as predictors of hospital satisfaction. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 220(2), 201.e1-201.e19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.10.093
Grundström, H., Malmquist, A., & Nieminen, K. (2024). Factors related to a positive childbirth experience – A cross-sectional study. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2024.2336141
Henrique, A. J., Rodney, P., Joolaee, S., Cox, S., Shriver, A., Moreira, C. B., Climaco, J., & Schirmer, J. (2021). Understanding childbirth pain in Brazilian women: A qualitative descriptive study. Women and Birth, 34(4), e368–e375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2020.08.003
Hugues, G. M., & Heilborn, M. L. (2021). “Cesárea? Não, Obrigada!”: Ativismo em uma comunidade online na busca pelo parto normal no Brasil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 37, e00047620. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00047620
Imprensa Nacional. (2024). Portaria GM/ms nº 5.349, de 12 de setembro de 2024. DOU – Imprensa Nacional. https://www.in.gov.br/web/dou/-/portaria-gm/ms-n-5.349-de-12-de-setembro-de-2024-584288137
Khatony, A., Soroush, A., Andayeshgar, B., Saedpanah, N., & Abdi, A. (2019). Attitude of primiparous women towards their preference for delivery method: a qualitative content analysis. Archives of Public Health, 77(1), [cap. 38]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-019-0364-y
Ledford, C. J. W., Canzona, M. R., Womack, J. J., & Hodge, J. A. (2016). Influence of Provider Communication on Women’s Delivery Expectations and Birth Experience Appraisal: A Qualitative Study. Family Medicine, 48(7), 523–531.
Marques, G. M., Nascimento, D. Z., Trevisol, D. J., & Iser, B. P. M. (2020). Instruments measuring pregnant women’s expectations of labor and childbirth: A systematic review. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 246, 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.01.014
Martins, A. C. M., Giugliani, E. R. J., Nunes, L. N., Bizon, A. M. B. L., de Senna, A. F. K., Paiz, J. C., de Avilla, J. C., & Giugliani, C. (2020). Factors associated with a positive childbirth experience in Brazilian women: A cross-sectional study. Women and Birth, 34(4), e337–e345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2020.06.003
Migliorini, L., Setola, N., Naldi, E., Rompianesi, M. C., Iannuzzi, L., Cardinali, P. (2023). Exploring the Role of Birth Environment on Italian Mothers’ Emotional Experience during Childbirth. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(15), 6529. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20156529
Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à saúde. (2016). Portaria nº 306, de 28 de março de 2016. Aprova as diretrizes de atenção à gestante: A operação cesariana. https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/sas/2016/prt0306_28_03_2016.html
Pereira, R. M., Fonseca, G. de O., Pereira, A. C. C. C., Gonçalves, G. A., & Mafra, R. A. (2018). Novas práticas de atenção ao parto e os desafios para a humanização da assistência nas regiões sul e sudeste do Brasil. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 23, 3517–3524. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320182311.07832016
Phunyammalee, M., Buayaem, T., & Boriboonhirunsarn, D. (2019). Fear of childbirth and associated factors among low-risk pregnant women. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 39(6), 763–767. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2019.1584885
Prior, E., Santhakumaran, S., Gale, C., Philipps, L. H., Modi, N., & Hyde, M. J. (2012). Breastfeeding after cesarean delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of world literature123. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 95(5), 1113–1135. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.111.030254
Rocha, N. F. F., & Ferreira, J. (2020). A escolha da via de parto e a autonomia das mulheres no Brasil: Uma revisão integrativa. Saúde em Debate, 44, 556–568. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-1104202012521
Rudey, E. L., Leal, M. C., & Rego, G. (2020). Cesarean section rates in Brazil: Trend analysis using the Robson classification system. Medicine, 99(17), e19880. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019880
Rúger-Navarrete, A., Vázquez-Lara, J. M., Antúnez-Calvente, I., Rodríguez-Díaz, L., Riesco-González, F. J., Palomo-Gómez, R., Gómez-Salgado, J., & Fernández-Carrasco, F. J. (2023). Antenatal Fear of Childbirth as a Risk Factor for a Bad Childbirth Experience. Healthcare, 11(3), 297. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11030297
Santos, Y. R. P., Carvalho, T. D. G., Leal, N. P., & Leal, M. C. (2023). Satisfaction with childbirth care in Brazilian maternity hospitals participating in the Stork Network program: Women’s opinions. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 39, e00154522. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311XEN154522
Sousa, J. R., & Santos, S. C. M. (2020). Análise de conteúdo em pesquisa qualitativa: Modo de pensar e de fazer. Pesquisa e Debate em Educação, 10(2), Artigo 2. https://doi.org/10.34019/2237-9444.2020.v10.31559
Velho, M. B., Brüggemann, O. M., McCourt, C., Gama, S. G. N., Knobel, R., Gonçalves, A. C., & d’Orsi, E. (2019). Modelos de assistência obstétrica na Região Sul do Brasil e fatores associados. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 35, e00093118. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00093118
Vescovi, G., Flach, K., Teodózio, A. M., Maia, G. N., & Levandowski, D. C. (2022). Saúde mental na gestação, no nascimento e na primeira infância: Análise crítica de políticas públicas brasileiras. Cadernos Saúde Coletiva, 30(4), 525–537. https://doi.org/10.1590/1414-462x202230040502
Webb, R., Ayers, S., Bogaerts, A., Jeličić, L., Pawlicka, P., Van Haeken, S., Uddin, N., Xuereb, R. B., Kolesnikova, N., Ayers, S., Bogaerts, A., Xuereb, R. B., Jeličić, L., Pawlicka, P., Soares, I., Sovilj, M., Ventura, S. S., & COST action CA18211:DEVoTION team. (2021). When birth is not as expected: A systematic review of the impact of a mismatch between expectations and experiences. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 21(1), 475. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03898-z
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.